<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for 呷飽沒 - Jia ba boe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ifreemans.org/blogs/formosa/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ifreemans.org/blogs/formosa</link>
	<description>Helping the World Know about Formosa (Taiwan)</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on 2010 US Census Race Question by 呷飽沒</title>
		<link>http://ifreemans.org/blogs/formosa/2009/06/17/2010-us-census-race-question/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>呷飽沒</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifreemans.org/blogs/formosa/?p=39#comment-115</guid>
		<description>First question is what is Han? Han is a sort-of made up ethnicity consisting of a melting pot of tribes. Second is the fact that &lt;a href="http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2007/11/21/2003388825" rel="nofollow"&gt;85% of Taiwanese have Aboriginal genes&lt;/a&gt;, so actually they should be marking down "Pacific Islander" and "Taiwanese". It really comes down to what you consider more important for your own ethnicity, if its Taiwanese, mark it down, if Han, then mark that. Ethnicity is always going to be something very difficult to nail down to nice neat buckets; the Nazis tried to do this and look at that mess created.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First question is what is Han? Han is a sort-of made up ethnicity consisting of a melting pot of tribes. Second is the fact that <a href="http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2007/11/21/2003388825" rel="nofollow">85% of Taiwanese have Aboriginal genes</a>, so actually they should be marking down &#8220;Pacific Islander&#8221; and &#8220;Taiwanese&#8221;. It really comes down to what you consider more important for your own ethnicity, if its Taiwanese, mark it down, if Han, then mark that. Ethnicity is always going to be something very difficult to nail down to nice neat buckets; the Nazis tried to do this and look at that mess created.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2010 US Census Race Question by john</title>
		<link>http://ifreemans.org/blogs/formosa/2009/06/17/2010-us-census-race-question/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifreemans.org/blogs/formosa/?p=39#comment-114</guid>
		<description>If one is ethnically Han but from Taiwan, do they still get to put Taiwanese down, given that the question asks for "Race", not "Nationality". Otherwise, it would seem like it's a violation of Title 13 Section 221, subject to a $500 fine (though I doubt the government really cares).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If one is ethnically Han but from Taiwan, do they still get to put Taiwanese down, given that the question asks for &#8220;Race&#8221;, not &#8220;Nationality&#8221;. Otherwise, it would seem like it&#8217;s a violation of Title 13 Section 221, subject to a $500 fine (though I doubt the government really cares).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kenneth W. Dowie 的228事件回憶錄首度公開 (漢譯) by Previously Unrevealed 2-28 Account &#171; 呷飽沒 - Jia ba boe</title>
		<link>http://ifreemans.org/blogs/formosa/2009/09/17/previously-unrevealed-2-28-account-chinese/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Previously Unrevealed 2-28 Account &#171; 呷飽沒 - Jia ba boe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifreemans.org/blogs/formosa/?p=78#comment-113</guid>
		<description>[...]        &#171; Response from Senator Patty Murray to Letter about Formosa Betrayed Movie Kenneth W. Dowie 的228事件回憶錄首度公開 (漢譯) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]        &laquo; Response from Senator Patty Murray to Letter about Formosa Betrayed Movie Kenneth W. Dowie 的228事件回憶錄首度公開 (漢譯) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Response from Senator Patty Murray to Letter about Formosa Betrayed Movie by Άλισον</title>
		<link>http://ifreemans.org/blogs/formosa/2009/09/16/response-from-senator-patty-murray-to-letter-about-formosa-betrayed-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Άλισον</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifreemans.org/blogs/formosa/?p=66#comment-111</guid>
		<description>It sure sounds like those form letters prepared by an aid.
When it comes to US national interests, human rights of others are not important...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sure sounds like those form letters prepared by an aid.<br />
When it comes to US national interests, human rights of others are not important&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Letter to Congress about Formosa Betrayed Movie by Response from Senator Patty Murray to Letter about Formosa Betrayed Movie &#171; 呷飽沒 - Jia ba boe</title>
		<link>http://ifreemans.org/blogs/formosa/2009/08/30/letter-to-congress-about-formosa-betrayed-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Response from Senator Patty Murray to Letter about Formosa Betrayed Movie &#171; 呷飽沒 - Jia ba boe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifreemans.org/blogs/formosa/?p=59#comment-110</guid>
		<description>[...] About        &#171; Letter to Congress about Formosa Betrayed Movie [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] About        &laquo; Letter to Congress about Formosa Betrayed Movie [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
