Archive for category One Formosa

Letter to Congress about Formosa Betrayed Movie

Dear [Congressperson],

I recently read that The Formosa Foundation has invited you to attend a Congressional screening of the film Formosa Betrayed in mid-September. This film is significant in helping every American Citizen understand what has gone on in Taiwan and how important the Taiwan relationship is in protecting US interests in Asia; for this reason I hope that you would make time in your busy schedule to attend.

While there is no doubt that Taiwanese can stand on their own, Taiwanese have suffered throughout history from whichever conquering nation happened to rule, including the Dutch, Japanese, and Chinese. Unfortunately this situation has not changed today; Taiwanese struggle to be recognized, even by its own various cultures and ethnicities, as an island people of their own culture and identity. Much of this is due to the US government allowing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to colonize Taiwan after WWII; the KMT proceeded to convince the multi-ethnic Taiwanese that they were Chinese, and Taiwan belonged to mother China. This ethnic and cultural genocide started from the “228″ incident in 1947 and continued into the 1980’s; hundreds of thousands of Taiwanese were killed by the KMT.

Taiwan’s recent history cannot be divorced from that of the United States and the film Formosa Betrayed illustrates a critical turning-point in the democratization of Taiwan and its relationship to the United States. This film is seminal because it presents Taiwan’s human rights history and will provide broader audiences an opportunity to glimpse the human story behind the Taiwanese struggle for identity.

Many are now concerned that the democracy and human rights that people fought and died for are once again under siege; the current KMT dominated government in Taiwan is again engaging in cultural cleansing; denying Taiwanese identity and pushing a pan-”Chinese culture as superior” agenda. Now more than ever it is important that leaders in Congress understand our shared past and stand firm in support of Taiwan’s young democracy.

As this Taiwan situation is so important, especially America’s continued close relationship with the Taiwanese in acting as a counterweight to the rise of a nationalistic and increasingly aggressive China, I look forward to hearing your thoughts on the film.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]

formosa-betrayed-congressional-invite

1 Comment

Debunking the Myth: “China has always ruled over Taiwan.”

One of the claims China makes internationally is that it has always ruled over Taiwan, going back to prehistory. This is the basis for China’s false claim of sovereignty over Taiwan. In fact, archeological digs in Taiwan have never found any evidence of permanent Chinese administrative structure on Taiwan.

The Portuguese in 1590 were the first to discover Taiwan, besides the original aborigine settlers who were of Polynesian descent. That’s why Taiwan’s first name was Formosa - a sailor called the island “Ihla Formosa!” when he saw it. The Dutch in fact were the first to rule over Taiwan, beginning in 1624. The first Chinese on Taiwan came as imported workers, under Dutch rule. They intermarried with the aborigines and stayed on Taiwan.

Really, the Chinese government was never interested in Taiwan back in those days. The Qing Dynasty was a land power and had no interest in the sea. After Dutch rule was overthrown in Taiwan, and piracy became a big problem off Taiwan’s coast, the American, French, and Japanese governments complained to the Qing government as the greater power in the area. The Qing’s response was “Taiwan is beyond our territory.”

It wasn’t until the Sino-Japanese War at the end of the 19th Century that China became interested in Taiwan at all. Because of the war, the land-based Qing decided in 1887 that they would like to annex the island to compete against Japan’s naval power. However, the Qing lost the war in 1895 and Japan became the ruler of Taiwan for the next 50 years.

Published in the FAPA YPG Newsleter 08/2009 By Albert Tseng

No Comments

Letter to Representative Reichert to Co-Sponsor HCR 18 supporting democratic Taiwan

April 29, 2009
The Honorable Dave Reichert
House of Representatives
1730 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515-4708

Re: Co-Sponsor HCR 18. Support democratic Taiwan.

Dear Representative Reichert:

On January 9, 2009, Rep. John Linder introduced House Concurrent Resolution 18 (H.Con.Res.18) calling for United States diplomatic recognition of Taiwan.

It’s time to right a wrong that the US allowed after WWII, the use of Taiwan as a pawn in the game against Communist China and Russia. The US allowed the defeated Chinese Nationalist regime to flee to Taiwan and establish a dictatorship of minority Chinese over the majority local Taiwanese. The US government, especially the US State Department, continues to perpetuate this wrong; discouraging a now democracy from the very thing that we in the US desired, self-determination.

The US government pushed the first local Taiwanese president to not allow a democratic vote on self-determination, and over what? US political and economic expediency; yes our own US State Department is being dictated to by Beijing. Now with US support the Chinese Nationalist are quickly eroding human rights in Taiwan and pushing closer to China. How does this help the US? Showing Beijing that democracy and ideals are for sale? Bowing to the saber-rattling of a self-important and insecure China dictatorship?

It is very important that the US supports and defends the rights of local Taiwanese to self-determination. It is also important that the US stops being silent in the face of the continues lies of China that Taiwan is part of China. In fact Taiwan was a part of the Japanese empire until the end of WWII, when it fell to US Military jurisdiction as all Japanese lands did (Guam, Saipan, Philippines, etc). Prior to this, the Dutch, Spanish, English and many other countries had outposts or controlled parts of Taiwan, the Dutch being first in 1624. In the San Francisco Peace Treaty of April 1952, Japan renounced all right, title, and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores. However, no receiving country was named for this territorial cession. The Republic of China was entrusted with authority over Formosa and the Pescadores based on the specifications of General Order No. 1 of Sept. 2, 1945, issued by General Douglas MacArthur. The Republic of China became a government-in-exile when it moved its central government to occupied Taiwan in mid-December 1949. Any historical documents prior to Japan’s control of Taiwan indicate the Manchus (northern foreigners who conquered China and ruled as the Qing dynasty) controlled only an small section of Taiwan for less than six years as a colony; similar to how several European countries controlled small sections of China as colonies, so shall we say China split from England? Neither therefore could Taiwan have split from the mainland as China keeps repeating.

We must support the right of democratic self-determination. I therefore strongly urge you to co-sponsor HCR 18.

Thank you very much for your support for Taiwan!

I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

No Comments

Response to statements saying “Taiwan split from mainland China”

The statement, “Taiwan split from the mainland amid civil war in 1949″ is a factual error. Taiwan was a part of the Japanese empire until the end of WWII, when it fell to US Military jurisdiction as all Japanese lands did (Guam, Saipan, Philippines, etc). Prior to this, the Dutch, Spanish, English and many other countries had outposts or controlled parts of Taiwan, the Dutch being first in 1624. In the San Francisco Peace Treaty of April 1952, Japan renounced all right, title, and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores. However, no receiving country was named for this territorial cession. The Republic of China was entrusted with authority over Formosa and the Pescadores based on the specifications of General Order No. 1 of Sept. 2, 1945, issued by General Douglas MacArthur. The Republic of China became a government-in-exile when it moved its central government to occupied Taiwan in mid-December 1949. Any historical documents prior to Japan’s control of Taiwan indicate the Manchus (northern foreigners who conquered China and ruled as the Qing dynasty) controlled only an small section of Taiwan for less than six years as a colony; similar to how several European countries controlled small sections of China as colonies, so shall we say China split from England? Neither therefore could Formosa have “split from the mainland.”


Please feel free to copy and paste this when you need to correct news articles that continue to repeat bad reporting.

No Comments